>> 欢迎您,请先登陆 | 注册 | 发贴排行 | 搜索 | 帮助 | 退出 | 管理 | 返回主页

    海外华人地球科学技术协会社区
    site
       re Taiwan seismology and earthquake engineering

发表一个新主题 显示可打印的版本 文字版本 把本贴打包邮递 打包邮递 把本贴加入论坛收藏夹 加入收藏夹 发送本页面给朋友 发送给朋友 刷新本主题

  
  cpan1
  用户等级:
  发表文章:4
  注册时间:
  
   给cpan1发送一个短消息短消息   查看admin的个人资料查看   点击这里发送电邮给cpan1邮件   引用回复这个贴子引用回复  回复贴子直接回复   搜索cpan1发表过的所有文章搜索
As to my understanding, a change of widely used scientific terminology is not a simple matter; it must be a necessity. Either it is because new discoveries have made the old terminology to become obsolete such that it can no longer be able to properly represent or describe the named physical phenomenon, or it has been discovered that the old terminology was inadequately defined from the start or simply defined wrong. In either case, you need a special committee to make a wide-scope discussion, as well as a formal presentation such as through publication to tell all the scientists concerned of the reasons why the terminology should be changed. If the feedbacks from the scientists are unanimously in favor, then formally announce the change. However, if there are still controversies, and you still think you are right, you may need a ballot to get an absolute majority. I hope you knew exactly what you were doing and believe you had gone through similar processes at least in Taiwan. However, earthquakes are not a special physical phenomenon occurred and studied only in Taiwan. I am not in a position to solicit opinions from other Chinese-speaking experts outside Taiwan on this change of terminology. However, from Chinese news reports around here I continue to find that, besides the Taiwan news media, nobody has followed your new terminology. Those Chinese-speaking scientists who had talked to the Chinese media around here were still using the old terminology, and even the Chinese newspaper which was already aware of this change still used both ¡°guimu¡± and ¡°jie¡± at the same time for the same earthquake, depending on their news sources. Well, you may say that you do not care about what the others say; what you do care is ¡°Taiwan first.¡± That is fine! Please do not forget seismology is a science and you are supposed doing scientific work; you should exactly know what you were doing. I still remember many years ago, when T. L. Teng was just beginning to introduce seismology to Taiwan, once he said to me, ¡°science has no boundaries.¡± I am not sure what he will say by now. I believe I have already made a mistake; I should not have got involved in such a monkey business after all.

   发贴时间:12/29/2005 5:23:51 PM      已设置保密

本帖子版权属于原作者所有,转载请与原作者联 系并注明出处 - 海外华人地球科学技术协会 [http://www.geochina.org]

相关贴子


  *为必填项目 只有注册用户能发表贴子

用户名: *  [注册]
密码: *  
标题: * 
 不得超过 50 个汉字
内容: