>> 欢迎您,请先登陆 | 注册 | 发贴排行 | 搜索 | 帮助 | 退出 | 管理 | 返回主页

    海外华人地球科学技术协会社区
    site
       re Taiwan seismology and earthquake engineering

发表一个新主题 显示可打印的版本 文字版本 把本贴打包邮递 打包邮递 把本贴加入论坛收藏夹 加入收藏夹 发送本页面给朋友 发送给朋友 刷新本主题

  
  cpan1
  用户等级:
  发表文章:4
  注册时间:
  
   给cpan1发送一个短消息短消息   查看admin的个人资料查看   点击这里发送电邮给cpan1邮件   引用回复这个贴子引用回复  回复贴子直接回复   搜索cpan1发表过的所有文章搜索
I am in Califnornia. There are so many strong motion seismometers installed around here, almost building-wise. But as far as I can recall, I do not remember I have ever heard from the news that intensity was announced to the public. I had also experienced Hiacheng and Tangshan earthqukes, I never remember intensity had been mentioned to the public. Strong motion seismology is not my field, I should not say much about it. However, to my point of view, intensity is more useful as a reference for earthquake engineering. Even in that case, g is much more useful, because all earthquake designs depend on g, and all seismic risk probablility maps are in g. During an earthquake, everybody is frightened and in panic, so to my point of view, technical announcement should be kept as simple as possible to avoid unnecessary confusion and the risk of unnecessary public panic. I believe that is why they do not announce intensity here and in China.

   发贴时间:12/29/2005 5:21:45 PM      已设置保密

本帖子版权属于原作者所有,转载请与原作者联 系并注明出处 - 海外华人地球科学技术协会 [http://www.geochina.org]

相关贴子


  *为必填项目 只有注册用户能发表贴子

用户名: *  [注册]
密码: *  
标题: * 
 不得超过 50 个汉字
内容: